ZeroTech Vengeance 6-24×50 Review: Which Version?

Last updated on August 17th, 2026

A ZeroTech Vengeance 6-24×50 review has to begin with the version, because the shared magnification and objective size hide two substantially different scope designs. The current range includes 1-inch second focal plane R3 models and 30mm first focal plane RMG models, with different turrets, zero-stop systems, eye relief, weights and prices.

I have not field tested these Vengeance 6-24×50 models. This is a researched comparison built from ZeroTech’s current Australian specifications and clearly attributed owner feedback. I will not turn manufacturer language into personal claims about glass, tracking, recoil resistance or low-light performance.

Quick verdict: choose the SFP R3 for a lighter, simple MOA hunting or range scope; choose the illuminated R3 only when reticle visibility in low light justifies the small weight and price increase. Choose an FFP RMG version for valid holds at every magnification, a zero stop and longer eye relief. The MRAD and MOA FFP models otherwise share the same basic chassis.

Four Vengeance 6-24×50 Versions Explained

This corrects the old page, which described the whole family as a 30mm illuminated scope. Only the FFP versions use a 30mm tube, and only the SFP R3 Illuminated model has illumination. The FFP RMG models are not illuminated.

Shared Features and Important Differences

All four versions use 6-24x magnification, a 50mm objective, a 6061-T6 aluminium maintube, side parallax adjustment and fully multi-coated lenses. ZeroTech lists each as IPX7 waterproof. From there, the two chassis split.

The 82mm eye relief on the SFP versions deserves attention on a harder-recoiling rifle or an action that forces an unusual head position. The FFP models publish a more generous 91-100mm range. Eye relief is not a quality score by itself, but it affects mounting latitude and should be checked against the rifle before choosing rings.

SFP R3: The Simpler Hunting and Range Option

The basic R3 model is the least expensive route into the 6-24×50 family. Its second focal plane reticle stays visually the same size as magnification changes, but the published MOA subtensions are calibrated at 24x. At lower magnification, the reticle can still be used as an aiming pattern, but its marked hold values are not one-for-one unless the shooter applies the correct conversion.

That is not automatically a disadvantage. A hunter who mainly uses the centre aiming point, occasionally dials elevation and wants a visually consistent reticle may prefer SFP. The 1-inch body also works with common hunting rings. However, the absence of a zero stop and the 50 MOA total adjustment range make it less purpose-built for frequent long-range dialling than the FFP version.

The illuminated model adds six brightness levels and 23g. It makes sense when the reticle can disappear against dark animals or backgrounds near the edge of legal light. It does not make the target brighter and it does not change the underlying SFP calibration. If illumination is not part of the actual use case, the non-illuminated model is the cleaner value choice.

FFP RMG: The Better Long-Range Feature Set

The FFP RMG versions use a 30mm tube, zero-stop elevation system and a reticle that scales with magnification. The MRAD version uses 0.5 mil primary subtensions, 0.1 mil measuring bars and 0.1 MRAD turret clicks. The MOA version uses 2 MOA primary subtensions, half-MOA measuring bars and 0.25 MOA clicks. Both use a floating centre dot and heavier outer references intended to draw the eye toward the centre at low power.

The key decision is not whether MRAD or MOA is inherently more accurate. It is whether the reticle, turrets, ballistic solver and spotting calls all use the same unit. A matched system reduces mistakes. The MIL versus MOA guide explains the practical difference.

At 698g, the FFP version is only 12g heavier than the basic SFP R3 on ZeroTech’s published figures. That makes the upgrade mostly about controls, reticle behaviour, eye relief and price rather than a large weight penalty. It still needs 30mm rings, so existing 1-inch hardware cannot be reused.

Turrets and Realistic Long-Range Use

A 24x headline does not by itself make a scope suitable for long-range dialling. The FFP Vengeance is the more coherent system because its zero stop gives a defined return reference and its reticle remains correctly subtended below maximum power. The SFP version can still work for known-distance target shooting, especially when used at 24x, but it asks the shooter to manage more limitations.

ZeroTech publishes 17.5 MRAD of internal adjustment for the MRAD FFP model and 60 MOA for the MOA FFP model. The Australian product page contains one inconsistent elevation line on the MRAD listing that says 60 MOA, while the windage and total-adjustment fields say 17.5 MRAD. This guide uses 17.5 MRAD as the internally consistent figure, but buyers should confirm the manual for their exact SKU.

No specification proves tracking. After mounting, verify the sample with a tall-target test, dial through the expected travel, return to zero repeatedly and compare the result with the reticle. That is especially important before using any budget scope for distant live targets.

Mounting and Bolt-Clearance Check

One verified owner of the SFP R3 reported that the magnification lever and a sharp rear edge interfered with the thumb while cycling the bolt quickly, particularly at low magnification. That is a single attributed owner report, not a universal defect, but it identifies a sensible pre-purchase check.

• Set the throw lever at the likely hunting magnification and cycle the bolt with a normal grip.
• Check ocular and bolt-handle clearance before finalising ring position.
• Set eye relief from the most demanding shooting position, not only from a bench.
• Confirm whether the rifle needs 1-inch or 30mm rings for the chosen version.
• Keep the 57mm objective housing clear of the barrel, rail and lens cover.

Use the scope rings and mounting guide to work through height and fit.

How It Stacks Up Against the Competition

The clearest in-house comparison is the ZeroTech Trace 3-18×50 LR Hunter. The Trace starts lower at 3x, uses an illuminated FFP LR Hunter reticle and publishes 100mm eye relief, but it weighs 825g and sits at a higher price. It is the more hunting-oriented crossover. The FFP Vengeance 6-24×50 gives more top-end magnification and a lower entry price, making it the more obvious range and learning platform.

The Vortex Venom 5-25×56 is another common comparison. It is a 34mm FFP scope with a larger objective and a more overtly target-oriented body. The FFP Vengeance is lighter and uses a 30mm tube; the Venom offers the larger 56mm objective and established EBR-7C reticle options. Without a controlled side-by-side test, this article will not declare a glass or tracking winner.

For a broader shortlist, compare the models in the best scopes under $1000 guide and best long-range rifle scopes guide.

Which Version Should You Buy?

My research-led choice for a dedicated long-range or rimfire target build would be the FFP model in the unit already used by the shooter. For a hunting rifle where most shots use the centre of the reticle and cost matters, the standard R3 is the more rational version. That is a feature-based recommendation, not a substitute for field testing.

What Owner Feedback Does and Does Not Prove

ZeroTech’s own product pages contain positive verified-owner comments about clarity, value and use on rifles including a Tikka T1x and .223 hunting setups. One FFP owner mentioned seeing .22 calibre holes at 200 yards in fly shooting; several SFP owners praised the price and image. These comments show how customers are using the scopes, but they do not establish controlled optical resolution, tracking accuracy or sample-to-sample consistency.

The useful consensus is narrower: buyers see the family as affordable, the 6-24x range is being used for target and hunting rifles, and the R3 throw-lever clearance should be checked. A proper PrecisionRifle field review still needs measured tracking, repeatable zero tests and a direct image comparison.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the ZeroTech Vengeance 6-24×50 FFP or SFP?

Both are available. The R3 and R3 Illuminated versions are second focal plane with 1-inch tubes. The RMG MRAD and RMG MOA versions are first focal plane with 30mm tubes.

Does the Vengeance 6-24×50 have a zero stop?

The FFP RMG versions have a zero stop. The SFP R3 versions do not.

Is the FFP Vengeance illuminated?

No. ZeroTech lists the current FFP RMG and RMG MOA models as non-illuminated. Illumination is available on the SFP R3 Illuminated version.

Which reticle is better, R3 or RMG?

R3 is cleaner and may suit centre-aiming hunters. RMG provides a fuller grid for measured elevation and wind holds. The better choice depends on whether the shooter values simplicity or a matched long-range hold system.

Related ZeroTech Guides

Start with the ZeroTech scopes review hub for the whole range. Compare the Trace 3-18×50 LR Hunter buyer guide, the field-tested Trace 4.5-27×50 review, and the higher-tier Trace Advanced 5-30×56 review.